↓ Skip to main content

Global estimates of growth–inequality–poverty (GIP) triangle: evidence from World Bank’s classification countries

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Global estimates of growth–inequality–poverty (GIP) triangle: evidence from World Bank’s classification countries
Published in
Quality & Quantity, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11135-013-9912-7
Authors

Muhammad Azhar Khan, Muhammad Zahir Khan, Khalid Zaman, Umar Hassan, Sobia Umar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,752,558
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#93
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,365
of 198,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.