| Title |
Measurements of frying fat deterioration: A brief review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS), March 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02582355 |
| Authors |
C. W. Fritsch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 14% |
| Engineering | 11 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#122
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379
of 6,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.