↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Local Deforestation on the Diversity and Structure of Southern California Giant Kelp Forest Food Webs

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
546 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Local Deforestation on the Diversity and Structure of Southern California Giant Kelp Forest Food Webs
Published in
Ecosystems, April 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10021-003-0245-6
Authors

Michael H. Graham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Canada 5 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 508 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 18%
Student > Bachelor 98 18%
Researcher 75 14%
Other 20 4%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 78 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 259 47%
Environmental Science 133 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Social Sciences 4 <1%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 93 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2010.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#635
of 1,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,933
of 58,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them