↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of a pancreatic DNase from pyloric caeca of atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of a pancreatic DNase from pyloric caeca of atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)
Published in
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02274225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Knut O. Strætkvern, Arnt J. Raae, Bernt T. Walther

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2003.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#71
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,590
of 61,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them