| Title |
Adaptation planning for floods: a review of available tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-013-0876-7 |
| Authors |
James Carl Banks, Janey V. Camp, Mark D. Abkowitz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 28% |
| Engineering | 23 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,701,487
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#592
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,243
of 204,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.