↓ Skip to main content

Structure-function relationships of icosahedral plant viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Structure-function relationships of icosahedral plant viruses
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01311078
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. S. Savithri, S. Suryanarayana, M. R. N. Murthy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#932
of 4,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,091
of 14,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.