↓ Skip to main content

Nipple aspirate fluids in adult nonlactating women — lactose content, cationic Na+, K+, Na+/K+ ratio, and coloration

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Nipple aspirate fluids in adult nonlactating women — lactose content, cationic Na+, K+, Na+/K+ ratio, and coloration
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01806552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas L. Petrakis, Mu Lan Lim, Rei Miike, Rose E. Lee, Maureen Morris, Linda Lee, Lynn Mason

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Materials Science 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2009.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,684
of 4,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,388
of 54,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.