↓ Skip to main content

Solid opaline packings of colloidal silica spheres

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science Letters, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
27 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Solid opaline packings of colloidal silica spheres
Published in
Journal of Materials Science Letters, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00720190
Authors

Albert P. Philipse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 32%
Physics and Astronomy 5 23%
Engineering 4 18%
Chemistry 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#105
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,508
of 58,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them