Title |
Recent Care of Common Mental Disorders in the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
|
DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.9908044.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip S. Wang, Patricia Berglund, Ronald C. Kessler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 167 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
Researcher | 30 | 17% |
Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 22% |
Unknown | 22 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 44 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,355,810
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,058
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,949
of 134,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#13
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.