↓ Skip to main content

Succession of bacterial microbiota in tilapia fillets at 4 °C and in situ investigation of spoilers

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Succession of bacterial microbiota in tilapia fillets at 4 °C and in situ investigation of spoilers
Published in
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11274-018-2452-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Duan, Xingzhi Zhou, Jianyin Miao, Xingxing Duan

Abstract

The succession of bacterial microbiota in tilapia fillets during cold storage at 4 °C was investigated employing PCR-DGGE method. Results showed that Pseudomonas was the most dominant genus during entire storage period. Shewanella and Psychrobacter were also always present, but became dominant only after 3 days of storage. Acinetobacter, Brevibacterium, Flavobacterium, Dietzia and Janthinobacterium were always the minor genera, among which Acinetobacter and Brevibacterium disappeared 6 days later, and Dietzia and Janthinobacterium only appeared at the end of storage. Further, the potential spoiler(s) of tilapia fillets at 4 °C were investigated in situ. The spoilage ability of a specific group of bacteria was evaluated as follows: Certain preservatives were selectively added to fillets to inhibit a specific group of bacteria, and then the changes in spoilage degree of fillets were determined. In this way the spoilage ability of the inhibited bacteria was evaluated. Our experiments showed that protamine strongly inhibited Pseudomonas but rarely inhibited Psychrobacter, Acinetobacter and Brevibacterium, but garlic juice, on the contrary, strongly inhibited the latter three but rarely inhibited the former. The mixed preservative, which consisted of protamine and garlic juice, didn't play better than protamine alone in preventing the spoilage of fillets. This indicated that Psychrobacter, Acinetobacter and Brevibacterium contribute little to the spoilage of tilapia fillets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,196,059
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#98
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,337
of 330,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.