| Title |
CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-VIBE MR imaging of the liver at 3.0T with gadoxetate disodium: a solution for transient arterial-phase respiratory motion-related artifacts?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-017-5210-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonhard Gruber, Vera Rainer, Michaela Plaikner, Christian Kremser, Werner Jaschke, Benjamin Henninger |
| Abstract |
To determine whether CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT) volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) improves image quality by reducing gadoxetate-disodium-associated transient arterial-phase motion artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver. MRI studies of the liver from 270 patients who had received gadoxetate disodium were retrospectively evaluated in regard to arterial timing accuracy and arterial phase motion artefact severity (VIBE: 90/270, CAIPIRINHA-VIBE: 90/270 and CDT-VIBE: 90/270 cases). Three independent and blinded readers assessed arterial phase timing and motion artefact severity (5-point scale). Interrater agreement was calculated by weighted kappa. Continuous variables were compared via a two-sided ANOVA, categorical variables via a χ2 test. An ordinal regression analysis was performed to identify other predictors of motion artefacts. CDT-VIBE improved correct late arterial timing rates and reduced motion-related image deterioration rates. Successful late arterial liver visualisation was achieved in 56.7% (VIBE) compared with 66.7% (CAIPIRINHA-VIBE) and 84.4% (CDT-VIBE) (P < 0.0001). Good/excellent image quality was achieved in 56.7% vs. 66.7% and 73.3%, respectively (P = 0.03). Male sex negatively influenced image quality (P = 0.03). CDT-VIBE increases the diagnostic utility of gadoxetate disodium-based liver MRI by reducing respiratory motion artefacts and optimising late arterial visualisation compared with VIBE and CAIPIRINHA-VIBE. • CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE-MRI (CDT) mitigates effects of acute transient dyspnoea caused by gadoxetate disodium. • CDT improves late arterial imaging compared with VIBE and CAIPIRINHA-VIBE. • The rate of ideal late arterial images is higher with CDT-VIBE vs. VIBE or CAIPI-VIBE. • The impact of respiratory motion artefacts on arterial phase images can be reduced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,908,166
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,077
of 4,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,333
of 440,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.