↓ Skip to main content

Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
402 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords
Published in
Memory & Cognition, January 1995
DOI 10.3758/bf03210559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E. Gathercole

Abstract

The extent to which children's performance on tests of nonword repetition is constrained by phonological working memory and long-term lexical knowledge was investigated in a longitudinal study of 70 children tested at 4 and 5 years of age. At each time of testing, measures of nonword repetition, memory span, and vocabulary knowledge were obtained. Reading ability was also assessed at 5 years. At both ages, repetition accuracy was greater for nonwords of high- rather than low-rated wordlikeness, and memory-span measures were more closely related to repetition accuracy for the low-wordlike than for the high-wordlike stimuli. It is argued that these findings indicate that nonword repetition for unwordlike stimuli is largely dependent on phonological memory, whereas repetition for wordlike items is also mediated by long-term lexical knowledge and is therefore less sensitive to phonological memory constraints. Reading achievement was selectively linked with earlier repetition scores for low-wordlike nonwords, suggesting a phonological memory contribution in the early stages of reading development. Vocabulary knowledge was associated with repetition accuracy for both low- and high-wordlike nonwords, consistent with the notion that lexical knowledge and nonword repetition share a reciprocal developmental relationship.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 207 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 24%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 9%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 34%
Linguistics 43 19%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,300,853
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#527
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,485
of 77,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.