| Title |
A new method for the biaxial testing of cellular solids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Mechanics, June 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02410498 |
| Authors |
D. Mohr, M. Doyoyo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 60% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Mechanics
#76
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,742
of 50,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Mechanics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them