↓ Skip to main content

Geographical variation of skull characters in pikas (Ochotona, Lagomorpha) of thealpina-hyperborea group

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Research, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Geographical variation of skull characters in pikas (Ochotona, Lagomorpha) of thealpina-hyperborea group
Published in
Mammal Research, March 2003
DOI 10.1007/bf03194262
Authors

Andrey A. Lissovsky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#272
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,141
of 62,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them