↓ Skip to main content

Patient Satisfaction and Costs of Multidisciplinary Models of Care in Rheumatology: a Review of the Recent Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Patient Satisfaction and Costs of Multidisciplinary Models of Care in Rheumatology: a Review of the Recent Literature
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11926-018-0727-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill Hall, K. Julia Kaal, Junho Lee, Ross Duncan, Nicole Tsao, Mark Harrison

Abstract

A number of novel models of care utilizing allied healthcare professionals, including nurses and pharmacists, have emerged as an alternate to rheumatologist specialist care to achieve disease outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We conducted a review of the literature for studies from the past 5 years that reported on measures of patient satisfaction and/or any health economic outcome in a model of care where the care providers had substantial, but not completely independent, responsibility. Previous reviews have summarized the available evidence for collaborative models of care led by nurses (only), which demonstrate that patients with inflammatory arthritis achieve similar disease outcomes and feel well supported with their person-centered care. Patients are generally highly satisfied with the care provided in collaborative care models, in line with if not greater than that provided by rheumatologists. However, we identified substantial variability in direct costs and/or overall intervention costs and measures of health-related quality of life across the various countries and healthcare systems. Overall, nursing-led interventions likely cost more than do physician-led models of care in the short-term but may lead to greater quality of life, as demonstrated with a disease-specific measure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,908,166
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#443
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,943
of 359,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.