↓ Skip to main content

Influences of acid treatments of active carbons on NO reduction over carbon-supported copper oxides

Overview of attention for article published in Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Influences of acid treatments of active carbons on NO reduction over carbon-supported copper oxides
Published in
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02068134
Authors

Zhiming Gao, Yue Wu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2004.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
#57
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,616
of 26,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them