↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical study of mass transfer in Li-Mg and Li-Mg-Al alloys

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Electrochemical study of mass transfer in Li-Mg and Li-Mg-Al alloys
Published in
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01023304
Authors

Y. Iwadate, M. Lassouani, F. Lantelme, M. Chemla

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 33%
Engineering 3 25%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2004.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#188
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,201
of 11,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them