| Title |
“But I’m Not Good at Math”: The Changing Salience of Mathematical Self-Concept in Shaping Women’s and Men’s STEM Aspirations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research in Higher Education, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x |
| Authors |
Linda J. Sax, M. Allison Kanny, Tiffani A. Riggers-Piehl, Hannah Whang, Laura N. Paulson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Professor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 89 | 32% |
| Psychology | 33 | 12% |
| Engineering | 21 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 15 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#598,165
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#23
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,258
of 243,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.