↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare costs associated with cardiovascular events in patients with hyperlipidemia or prior cardiovascular events: estimates from Swedish population-based register data

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthcare costs associated with cardiovascular events in patients with hyperlipidemia or prior cardiovascular events: estimates from Swedish population-based register data
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10198-015-0702-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Hallberg, S. R. Gandra, K. M. Fox, J. Mesterton, J. Banefelt, G. Johansson, L.-Å. Levin, P. Sobocki

Abstract

To estimate healthcare costs of new cardiovascular (CV) events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart failure) in patients with hyperlipidemia or prior CV events. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using Swedish national registers and electronic medical records. Patients with hyperlipidemia or prior CV events were stratified into three cohorts based on CV risk level: history of major cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) risk-equivalent, and low/unknown risk. Propensity score matching was applied to compare patients with new events to patients without new events for estimation of incremental costs of any event and by event type. A CV event resulted in increased costs over 3 years of follow-up, with the majority of costs occurring in the 1st year following the event. The mean incremental cost of patients with a history of major CVD (n = 6881) was <euro>8588 during the 1st year following the event. This was similar to that of CHD risk-equivalent patients (n = 3226; <euro>6663) and patients at low/unknown risk (n = 2497; <euro>8346). Ischemic stroke resulted in the highest 1st-year cost for patients with a history of major CVD and CHD risk-equivalent patients (<euro>10,194 and <euro>9823, respectively); transient ischemic attack in the lowest (<euro>3917 and <euro>4140). Incremental costs remained elevated in all cohorts during all three follow-up years, with costs being highest in the major CVD history cohort. Healthcare costs of CV events are substantial and vary considerably by event type. Incremental costs remain elevated for several years after an event.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 27 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#919
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,312
of 264,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.