↓ Skip to main content

Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the foregut in Wirenia argentea and Genitoconia rosea (Mollusca, Solenogastres)

Overview of attention for article published in Zoomorphology, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the foregut in Wirenia argentea and Genitoconia rosea (Mollusca, Solenogastres)
Published in
Zoomorphology, September 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00435-003-0089-9
Authors

C. Todt, L. v. Salvini-Plawen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Researcher 5 28%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#123
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,766
of 56,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.