↓ Skip to main content

Noesis and the encyclopedic internet vision

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Noesis and the encyclopedic internet vision
Published in
Synthese, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9663-0
Authors

Anthony F. Beavers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unknown 12 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#819
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,154
of 94,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.