↓ Skip to main content

Lazy caching in TLA

Overview of attention for article published in Distributed Computing, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 114)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Lazy caching in TLA
Published in
Distributed Computing, May 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004460050063
Authors

Peter Ladkin, Leslie Lamport, Bryan Olivier, Denis Roegel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 15%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 69%
Mathematics 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2004.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Distributed Computing
#28
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,892
of 36,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Distributed Computing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them