↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of the attentional and consolidation hypotheses for the facilitation of memory by nicotine

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the attentional and consolidation hypotheses for the facilitation of memory by nicotine
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02247418
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. M. Warburton, J. M. Rusted, J. Fowler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2003.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,113
of 5,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,275
of 18,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.