↓ Skip to main content

Transgenic plantlets of ‘Chancellor’ grapevine (Vitis sp.) from biolistic transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Transgenic plantlets of ‘Chancellor’ grapevine (Vitis sp.) from biolistic transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00232362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie R. Kikkert, Dominique Hébert-Soulé, Patricia G. Wallace, Michael J. Striem, Bruce I. Reisch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Master 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2007.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#779
of 2,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,901
of 79,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.