↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2005
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy Schulz, Petra H. Lahmann, Heiner Boeing, Kurt Hoffmann, Naomi Allen, Timothy J.A. Key, Sheila Bingham, Elisabet Wirfält, Göran Berglund, Eva Lundin, Göran Hallmans, Annekatrin Lukanova, Carmen Martínez Garcia, Carlos A. González, Maria J. Tormo, José R. Quirós, Eva Ardanaz, Nerea Larrañaga, Eiliv Lund, Inger T. Gram, Guri Skeie, Petra H.M. Peeters, Carla H. van Gils, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Frederike L. Büchner, Patrizia Pasanisi, Rocco Galasso, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Antonia Trichopoulou, Victoria Kalapothaki, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Jenny Chang-Claude, Jakob Linseisen, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Marina Touillaud, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, Mette Tetsche, Mazda Jenab, Teresa Norat, Rudolph Kaaks, Elio Riboli

Abstract

The association between consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of ovarian cancer is still unclear from a prospective point of view.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,520,217
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#744
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,658
of 76,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.