↓ Skip to main content

On the trend to global equilibrium for spatially inhomogeneous kinetic systems: The Boltzmann equation

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
On the trend to global equilibrium for spatially inhomogeneous kinetic systems: The Boltzmann equation
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00222-004-0389-9
Authors

L. Desvillettes, C. Villani

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Professor 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 28 44%
Engineering 6 9%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,965
of 158,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.