↓ Skip to main content

High-dose ion implantation of ceramics: benefits and limitations for tribology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
High-dose ion implantation of ceramics: benefits and limitations for tribology
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00551911
Authors

S. J. Bull, T. F. Page

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Energy 2 33%
Materials Science 2 33%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 1991.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,321
of 54,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.