↓ Skip to main content

An on-chip glitchy-clock generator for testing fault injection attacks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
An on-chip glitchy-clock generator for testing fault injection attacks
Published in
Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13389-011-0022-y
Authors

Sho Endo, Takeshi Sugawara, Naofumi Homma, Takafumi Aoki, Akashi Satoh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 44%
Student > Master 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 50%
Engineering 5 31%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#22
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,253
of 140,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.