| Title |
Stationary states of the Hartline-Ratliff model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, July 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00319520 |
| Authors |
K. P. Hadeler, D. Kuhn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 67% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,372
of 12,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them