↓ Skip to main content

Systems biology of evolution: the involvement of metal ions

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Systems biology of evolution: the involvement of metal ions
Published in
BioMetals, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10534-007-9087-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. P. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Spain 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 31%
Chemistry 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#159
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,255
of 162,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.