↓ Skip to main content

A geometry-based investigation of the tool path generation for zigzag pocket machining

Overview of attention for article published in The Visual Computer, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
A geometry-based investigation of the tool path generation for zigzag pocket machining
Published in
The Visual Computer, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01905694
Authors

Martin Held

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 53%
Computer Science 8 24%
Mathematics 2 6%
Materials Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Visual Computer
#181
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,784
of 16,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Visual Computer
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.