| Title |
Interaction of Afobazole with σ1-Receptors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10517-009-0624-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. B. Seredenin, T. A. Antipova, M. V. Voronin, S. Yu. Kurchashova, A. N. Kuimov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 38% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 3 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,929,498
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#29
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,666
of 173,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.