↓ Skip to main content

Ridges and tidal stress on Io

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ridges and tidal stress on Io
Published in
ICARUS, May 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.01.003
Authors

Gwendolyn D., Elizabeth P. Turtle, Windy L. Jaeger, Laszlo P. Keszthelyi, Richard Greenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Professor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 56%
Physics and Astronomy 6 38%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,514
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.