↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Human-Robot Interaction Torque Estimation Methods in a Wrist Rehabilitation Exoskeleton

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Human-Robot Interaction Torque Estimation Methods in a Wrist Rehabilitation Exoskeleton
Published in
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10846-018-0786-8
Authors

Mohammadhossein Saadatzi, David C. Long, Ozkan Celik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 39%
Computer Science 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
#278
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,179
of 451,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.