| Title |
Computer assessment of vertebral deformity (report 1)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, August 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02375642 |
| Authors |
Tomoji Deguchi, Tetsuo Inoue, Kazuhiro Kushida, Yoshihiko Sumi, Hajime Orimo, Gentaro Yamashita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 1993.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#148
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,709
of 12,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them