| Title |
Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium: severe bias in small samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-005-9103-8 |
| Authors |
Phillip R. England, Jean-Marie Cornuet, Pierre Berthier, David A. Tallmon, Gordon Luikart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 217 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 26% |
| Researcher | 61 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 158 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2010.
All research outputs
#3,612,908
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#198
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,948
of 70,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.