↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of karyotypes in snakes

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, June 1972
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of karyotypes in snakes
Published in
Chromosoma, June 1972
DOI 10.1007/bf00326193
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Singh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#206
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#737
of 3,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them