| Title |
Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0 |
| Authors |
Rubén Comas-Forgas, Jaume Sureda-Negre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 29% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 36 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 26% |
| Unknown | 74 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#290
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,325
of 194,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.