↓ Skip to main content

Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy
Published in
Pathology, December 2011
DOI 10.1097/pat.0b013e32834ba487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matheesha Ranaweera, Hemamali Samaratunga, David Duffy, Kiara Klopfer, Matteo Brunelli, Guido Martignoni, Brett Delahunt

Abstract

The modified Gleason system of 2005 recommends incorporating higher grade tertiary patterns on needle biopsy into final Gleason scores to better correlate with radical prostatectomy findings. However, limited literature exists on the validity of this practice and the significance of tertiary Gleason patterns in needle biopsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2011.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pathology
#577
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,986
of 246,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.