| Title |
Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00576271 |
| Authors |
J. Subrahmanyam, M. Vijayakumar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 45 | 35% |
| Engineering | 30 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
| Energy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,765,463
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#295
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,701
of 62,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.