↓ Skip to main content

Alkali Cation Selectivity and Surface Charge of 2:1 Clay Minerals

Overview of attention for article published in Clays and Clay Minerals, October 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Alkali Cation Selectivity and Surface Charge of 2:1 Clay Minerals
Published in
Clays and Clay Minerals, October 1992
DOI 10.1346/ccmn.1992.0400511
Authors

Shihe Xu, James B. Harsh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Professor 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 20%
Environmental Science 4 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 16%
Engineering 4 16%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 1998.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Clays and Clay Minerals
#86
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,297
of 17,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clays and Clay Minerals
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them