| Title |
Short-distance navigation in cephalopods: a review and synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Processing, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10339-007-0192-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christelle Alves, Jean G. Boal, Ludovic Dickel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 47% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,801,038
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#61
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,702
of 84,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them