You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Model selection bias and Freedman’s paradox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10463-009-0234-4 |
| Authors |
Paul M. Lukacs, Kenneth P. Burnham, David R. Anderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 97 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 174 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 72 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,099,262
of 23,506,090 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#18
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,192
of 111,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them