↓ Skip to main content

The role of ethylene in the senescence of carnation flowers, a review

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Growth Regulation, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The role of ethylene in the senescence of carnation flowers, a review
Published in
Plant Growth Regulation, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00040506
Authors

A. C. Van Altvorst, A. G. Bovy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 48%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 1998.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Plant Growth Regulation
#89
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,267
of 76,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Growth Regulation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.