| Title |
Cognitive decline in the elderly: A double- blind, placebo- controlled multicenter study on efficacy of phosphatidylserine administration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03324139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teresa Cenacchi, T. Bertoldin, C. Farina, M. G. Fiori, G. Crepaldi, C. F. Azzini, R. Girardello, B. Bagozzi, R. Garuti, P. Vivaldi, G. Belloni, A. Bordin, M. Durando, M. Lo Storto, L. Bertoni, A. Battistoni, C. Cacace, P. Arduini, A. Bonini, M. P. Caramia, G. Vaglieri, A. Brusomini, G. Donà, A. March, N. Campi, P. Cannas, F. Casson, G. Cavallarin, M. Delia, G. Cristianini, O. Louvier, F. Mello, R. Fameli, N. Urbani de Gheltoff, O. De Candia, G. Nante, C. Cattoni, P. L. Forte, M. Loreggian, A. Targa, G. Mansoldo, G. Noro, A. Meggio, F. Pedrazzi, F. Bonmartini, C. Ruggiano, M. Peruzza, G. Olivari, E. Recaldin, C. Bellunato, G. Rigo, M. Marin, L. Marinangeli, A. Saracino, O. Miceli, G. Lovo, R. Scarpa, L. Battistello, E. Tomat, B. Bernava, P. Olivo, G. Verga, G. Merli, A. M. Zerman, R. Crivellaro, A. Vozza, G. R. Ziliotto, V. Favaretto, L. Allegro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,224,886
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#61
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,143
of 199,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#7
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.