↓ Skip to main content

Are lactoferrin receptors in Gram-negative bacteria viable vaccine targets?

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Are lactoferrin receptors in Gram-negative bacteria viable vaccine targets?
Published in
BioMetals, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10534-018-0105-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clement Chan, Vahid F. Andisi, Dixon Ng, Nick Ostan, Warren K. Yunker, Anthony B. Schryvers

Abstract

A number of important Gram-negative pathogens that reside exclusively in the upper respiratory or genitourinary tract of their mammalian host rely on surface receptors that specifically bind host transferrin and lactoferrin as a source of iron for growth. The transferrin receptors have been targeted for vaccine development due to their critical role in acquiring iron during invasive infection and for survival on the mucosal surface. In this study, we focus on the lactoferrin receptors, determining their prevalence in pathogenic bacteria and comparing their prevalence in commensal Neisseria to other surface antigens targeted for vaccines; addressing the issue of a reservoir for vaccine escape and impact of vaccination on the microbiome. Since the selective release of the surface lipoprotein lactoferrin binding protein B by the NalP protease in Neisseria meningitidis argues against its utility as a vaccine target, we evaluated the release of outer membrane vesicles, and transferrin and lactoferrin binding in N. meningitidis and Moraxella catarrhalis. The results indicate that the presence of NalP reduces the binding of transferrin and lactoferrin by cells and native outer membrane vesicles, suggesting that NalP may impact all lipoprotein targets, thus this should not exclude lactoferrin binding protein B as a target.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Chemistry 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,492,220
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#526
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,018
of 327,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.