↓ Skip to main content

Challenges and opportunities associated with neglected tropical disease and water, sanitation and hygiene intersectoral integration programs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Challenges and opportunities associated with neglected tropical disease and water, sanitation and hygiene intersectoral integration programs
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1838-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Anna Johnston, Jordan Teague, Jay P. Graham

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions, in addition to mass drug administration (MDA), are necessary for controlling and eliminating many neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). This study investigated the integration of NTD and WASH programming in order to identify barriers to widespread integration and make recommendations about ideal conditions and best practices critical to future integrated programs. Twenty-four in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the global NTD and WASH sectors to identify barriers and ideal conditions in programmatic integration. The most frequently mentioned barriers to WASH and NTD integration included: 1) differing programmatic objectives in the two sectors, including different indicators and metrics; 2) a disproportionate focus on mass drug administration; 3) differences in the scale of funding; 4) siloed funding; and 5) a lack of coordination and information sharing between the two sectors. Participants also conveyed that a more holistic approach was needed if future integration efforts are to be scaled-up. The most commonly mentioned requisite conditions included: 1) education and advocacy; 2) development of joint indicators; 3) increased involvement at the ministerial level; 4) integrated strategy development; 5) creating task forces or committed partnerships; and 6) improved donor support. Public health practitioners planning to integrate NTD and WASH programs can apply these results to create conditions for more effective programs and mitigate barriers to success. Donor agencies should consider funding more integration efforts to further test the proof of principle, and additional support from national and local governments is recommended if integration efforts are to succeed. Intersectoral efforts that include the development of shared indicators and objectives are needed to foster conditions conducive to expanding effective integration programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Researcher 22 14%
Lecturer 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Environmental Science 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,623,836
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,995
of 14,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,238
of 266,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#51
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.