↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of SVD methods to extract the foetal electrocardiogram from cutaneous electrode signals

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, May 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of SVD methods to extract the foetal electrocardiogram from cutaneous electrode signals
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, May 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02442670
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Callaerts, B. De Moor, J. Vandewalle, W. Sansen, G. Vantrappen, J. Janssens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Researcher 6 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 56%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#547
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,554
of 15,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them