↓ Skip to main content

Men in red: A reexamination of the red-attractiveness effect

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Men in red: A reexamination of the red-attractiveness effect
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0866-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera M. Hesslinger, Lisa Goldbach, Claus-Christian Carbon

Abstract

Elliot, Kayser, Greitemeyer, Lichtenfeld, Gramzow, Maier, and Liu (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 399-417, 2010) showed that presenting men in front of a red background or with a red shirt enhances their attractiveness, sexual desirability, and status in the eyes of female observers. The purpose of the present research was to gain further insights concerning the robustness and the ecological validity of this red effect. In two experiments, we replicated the basic paradigm used by Elliot et al. Experiment 1 was a close replication of the first experiment in their original series. We presented the photo of a young man used by Elliot et al. on either a red or white background and asked participants (N = 89, female subsample n = 72) to rate it with regard to perceived attractiveness. Experiment 2 (N = 32) represents a somewhat more complex version of the first experiment; we increased the variance of the stimuli by showing photos of multiple men wearing different apparel styles (formal and casual, respectively). We did not find any significant impact of red in either of the studies. What we found, however, was a significant effect of apparel style with attractiveness ratings being higher for men wearing formal apparel than for men wearing casual apparel. Our results question the robustness and the ecological validity of Elliot et al.'s finding. On a more general level, they further point to limitations arising from (often necessary) restrictions in experimental designs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 30%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 60%
Unspecified 3 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 28%