| Title |
The precipitation of α-phase in metastable β -phase Ti alloys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, November 1975
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03161837 |
| Authors |
Cecil G. Rhodes, James C. Williams |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 18 | 44% |
| Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 1995.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#223
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,172
of 4,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.